How is Rimator different from autonomous pentesting tools?
Autonomous pentesting finds and exploits attack paths, then hands you a report. Rimator does that too, then keeps going: it checks every attack step against what your EDR, SIEM, and other controls actually reported, turns each miss into a specific fix, and replays the attack until the fix holds. You learn not only how you could be breached, but whether you would notice and whether it is resolved.
How is it different from breach and attack simulation (BAS)?
BAS replays predefined techniques and typically stops at a score. Rimator runs full adversary campaigns through your real environment, grounds every verdict in your own telemetry, and drives each finding through remediation and re-test to closure.
Is it safe to run against production?
Yes. That constraint shapes the whole platform. Campaigns are scope-gated to targets you define, budgeted, and reversible, and every action is logged and replayable. Attacks are designed to prove a path exists, never to disrupt the systems they touch.
Does it replace our SOC or pentest program?
No. Rimator proves and strengthens the team and tools you already have. Your SOC works from verdicts instead of assumptions, and human-led engagements can focus on the creative work only people can do, while Rimator keeps validating continuously in between.
Where does our telemetry go, and who can see findings?
Signals you connect are used for exactly one thing: correlating each attack step with what your defenses reported. Findings, artifacts, and raw telemetry stay scoped to your workspace, are never shared across customers, and are accessible only to invited, role-scoped users.
How quickly can we be running, and can it run on-premises?
Rimator is fully hosted and managed, so there is nothing to deploy. Connect your scope and signals and the first campaign starts within hours, with the first verdict the same day. On-premises and private-cloud deployments are available for teams that need the platform inside their own perimeter.